What no-one tells you about the true power of networking


By Neil Patrick

How and why personal networks actually work has not been widely discussed outside of academic theories. Much of the available research is also too old to reflect the critical impact of social media.

So this weekend I have been reviewing the research evidence to try and produce some insights which I hope are helpful.

Most of the material I found talks about the benefits and tactics of effective networking, but very few writers discuss exactly HOW and WHY it works from the perspective of growing our career opportunities.

Many of my own professional contacts misunderstand the value because they don’t grasp the mathematical and social forces that they can unleash. Yes that’s right, I said mathematical.

If you understand this aspect, I guarantee your thinking about networking will be transformed.

Networking is largely misunderstood

Most people think of networking as a heavy investment of their time and energy. And since we have too little of both usually, it gets deprioritised as a task. This is a mistake and it reflects a misunderstanding of what networking is, what is involved and how it creates value.

The critical thing to understand is the power and value of weak ties

A strong tie (or link) is someone who knows a lot about you and who you are in frequent contact with (say at least once a month). A weak tie is someone who doesn’t know you that well, but knows a little about you and has an interaction with you say every 6 months or so.

Most people think that only strong ties can be of value to them in their careers. After all, if someone is only vaguely aware of you, how much value can that relationship really have?

Big mistake.

Now the math bit

This is where it gets interesting. No-one can have a very large number of strong ties. Around 200-250 or so is probably the maximum. There are just not enough hours in the day to manage much more than that.

Weak ties however are a different matter. You can quite easily maintain thousands of these. And social media is a powerful tool that helps you do exactly that.

So unlike strong ties, with weak ties and social media, you can easily grow your network to many thousands.

Now of course, only a small fraction of these might be of benefit to you.

But because you are just one person and with a little effort, your weak ties can be grown steadily, the number of potential opportunities available to you expands in proportion with the growth of your network of weak ties.

And of course the most valuable of your weak ties may well mature into strong ties over time.

But that’s not all

I like to think of what I call the “snowball analogy” when I think about weak ties. Imagine you are standing at the top of snow covered hill. You pick up a handful of snow. This is your current network. The rest of the snow on the ground is all those people you are not yet connected with.

You compact the snow into a ball and place it on the ground. Now you start to push it down the slope. At first not much happens. The ball slowly gets a bit larger and as it does so, its circumference increases. This increased circumference means that with each full turn, the ball picks up much more snow.



Once the ball gets to a certain size and depending on the degree of the slope, it reaches a critical mass. At this point, the ball’s own weight propels it down the hill faster and faster with you doing absolutely nothing at all.

Now with each rotation, the ball is picking up many times more snow than the original handful you held in your hands.

Exactly the same thing happens with social media networks

Most of us have a core of strong ties that we rely upon for our professional network. But this is a huge error.

Strong ties might seem instinctively to be more valuable than weak ties. In some ways they are. But they have limitations too:

  • Typically, they are a subset of the people you have encountered in your day to day life. This means they tend to be restricted to your own social and professional areas of activity. And that means they are not only limited, they also will have significant duplications of knowledge and contacts with yourself and each other.

  • They carry a degree of obligation which can be counterproductive. For example, if your employer is looking to fill a new more senior position, would they attach much weight to a colleague’s opinion about you that they knew you had a friendship with?

  • But most of all, they are finite as mentioned at the start of this post. There’s not too much space left in your life to add many more strong ties, unless they are really valuable to you.


And that’s the magic of understanding network mathematics.

If you devote a proportion of your networking efforts to continually expanding your number of weak ties, your network will grow increasingly quickly. And you'll need to invest much less time.

And whilst these may be weak ties that individually only deliver a small return for you, that return is more or less constant, whether your number of weak ties is 100 or 10,000.

So 1% of a hundred weak ties will not deliver many opportunities for you. But 1% of 10,000? Now that’s a very different matter…


8 comments:

  1. Neil,

    I’ve seen the exact opposite among people who have obtained jobs through networking—it’s the strong ties that matter the most.

    Some of these ties are with people who know you well and have valued your work in the past. Other ties are with people who simply like to help certain types of people, for instance, people with big Rolodexes and years of professional work experience who want to help their own children and peers of their children (now in their twenties) to get a foot into the professional world.

    Sure, you can get someone to hand-carry your resume to the hiring manager, but many other people are doing the same. Having someone who will make a phone call for you and make your case can make all the difference.

    -Diana

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you for sharing these observations Diana. I've seen it too and helped my own network with key introductions. So I'm not undervaluing the value of strong ties, but I do think that weak ties are undervalued. If I look at my diary over the next few weeks, the majority of my meetings and contacts will be with people who are currently weak ties...but I'd expect a good number of them to mature into strong ties over time. So I don't think our views are actually contradictory.

      Delete
  2. Neil,

    As I think some more about it, the real situation is that the weak connections are so much weaker than in the past.

    At the weakest end of the spectrum are Twitter followers to people with tens of thousands of followers and LinkedIn networkers who have also connected with tens of thousands. Some of these people are actually interested in developing relationships with others, while others are only looking for numbers.

    I’d guess that generally speaking, what we are calling “weak connections” are actually mid-range connections, where both parties know each other or at least recognize each other’s names.

    Back in olden days before social media, we had very few truly weak connections. Today these weak connections provide opportunities for deepening the relationships if we choose to invest the time and energy. However, if we don’t put the effort into them, I question how valuable they can be.

    -d

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Interesting point Diana. I agree that the strong and weak tie, two tier model is probably inadequate to describe a world with social media, which at least requires a three tier classification.

      I also agree that no effort equals no results in terms of benefits.

      Thanks for these ideas...I will revisit them maybe in another post :-)

      Delete
  3. Excellent post Neil - a lot of my success has come about from networks - both via weak and strong ties https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/20140709062546-253129-the-power-of-networks

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Peter. Sorry I have auto-disabled links from the comments section due to spammer abuse. But I am happy to publish and vouch for your link and am off there now! :-)

      Delete
  4. Great book on this topic by Adam Grant "Give and Take" about value of networking and how done throughout more and less successful careers.
    Neil, also agree that value of weak links is not well understood but can be substantial to learning more about potential fields, target employers, market, as well as developing into employee referrals.
    Great article!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks so much for your comment Patra. It's a privilege to have you posting here. Thanks also for the book recommendation - I'll be sure to check it out. Have a great week! :-)

      Delete